Assess the dramatic effect of Eva Smith in relation to two of the characters in An Inspector Calls Essays

Assess the dramatic effect of Eva Smith in relation to two of the characters in An Inspector Calls Essays Assess the dramatic effect of Eva Smith in relation to two of the characters in An Inspector Calls Essay Assess the dramatic effect of Eva Smith in relation to two of the characters in An Inspector Calls Essay Essay Topic: Literature We are halfway through Act Three of An Inspector Calls by J. B. Priestley. The Inspector has, just as eerily and spookily as he arrived, exited the home of the Birling family. His provocation of the revelations that have been forced out by all members of the family including Sheilas husband-to-be Gerald, has left them bewildered and as very different people to the happy family group they were a few hours previously. In this play, the Inspector has very prominently acted as the representative for Eva Smith, who has apparently died tragically this night. We are given a few details about this girl she was country-born and was blessed with soft brown hair and dark brown eyes and a pretty appearance. Taking into account the fact that Eva is a young woman to whom we have never spoken and who does not physically enter this play at all she is but a diary, a photograph and a story how exactly has she managed to affect these five lives so colossally? I will focus on the reactions of and the effect upon Arthur and Sheila Birling father and daughter. It appears that, ironically, the Birling family has once again been split. At the beginning of the play, the audience remembers the men together in the drawing room, sharing drinks and talking of success. Mr. Birling, father of Eric and Sheila, is obviously a businessman with a very capitalist nature and way of thinking, given his mission statement working together for lower costs and higher prices as he lectures Gerald and Eric. Maybe this personality flaw is what has caused him to continue being stubborn and disbelieving towards Inspector Goole, now that he has gone. What does Mr. Birling care that Eva has died, and that, as pointed out by the Inspector, neither he nor his wife, son, daughter or her fiance an ever even say Im sorry, Eva Smith? It seems Arthur Birlings pompous and selfish attitude is stronger than his feelings of guilt. Even before Mr. Birling realises that the unfair and unjustified, abrupt dismissal of Eva from Birling Company two years ago, following her request for a rise and the ensuing workers strike, contributed to her death, he says, its a perfectly straightforward case, and as it happened more than eighteen months ago obviously it has nothing to do with the wretched girls suicide! The use of the word wretched is very damning and disrespectful of Eva, especially considering Mr. Birlings own input into her death. Of his refusal to grant Eva the couple of shillings more that she requested, he says, if you dont come down sharply on some of these people, theyd soon be asking for the Earth! He does not realise how much of the Earth he himself has actually taken, until the Inspector wittily replies, after all its better to ask for the Earth than to take it. It appears that Inspector Goole has managed to stir up some feelings of panic in Mr. Birling though as youd imagine they are not related to Evas tragic death or his involvement in it. He is, in fact, worrying again about his social standing and prestige. He has discovered that, to keep Eva and the child they were expecting before she died, Arthurs son, Eric, had been stealing money from Birling Company to give to her. Mr. Birling knows that as soon as Eva realised the money she was being given was stolen, she refused to take any more. He still, however, hurriedly insists that Eric give him a record of those accounts so that he can cover thi s up as soon as possible. Mr. Birlings driving concern is his own self-interest. Theyll be a public scandal, he says tactlessly. Here we note how hes prepared to pay out thousands to keep the scandal quiet. Mr. Birling is more concerned with the embarrassment he would face if it was to arise that Eric had stolen some of the companys money, rather than his own sons deceit and his reasons for taking the money in the first place. After all, any revelations about Birling Co. would surely hinder Arthur Birlings chance of being knighted. If we keep track of Birlings behaviour ever since the point of the Inspectors exit, we notice his relief at the point when the family begins to question the identity of the Inspector. When it becomes apparent that Gerald has actually established that Inspector Goole is not a registered member of the force, Mr. Birling cheers up considerably! Obviously the reason for this is his comfort in thinking there might still be a chance of knighthood for him. Surely the majority of his family would simply be relieved that the untoward parts they played in the life of a young woman were not cumulative and there has in fact been no actual death? Mrs. Birling certainly takes this view, apparently forgetting that the family members did do what they did, and says of her children, In the morning theyll be as amused as we are. However, Sheila Birling, Arthurs daughter, is considerably more affected by the revelations than her father. For Eva, whether or not she exists or did exist, has proved to be a poignant learning curve for Sheila in relation to her temper and the way she acts in relation to others. Sheila, of course, was a regular customer at the department store called Milwards when Eva was enjoying a fairly steady, well-paid job there. Sheila was being adamant and very stubborn towards her mother and insisted that she try on a dress shed seen. Sheila had been in a furious temper that day anyway, and we realise later that it was because her partner Gerald had been having an affair (or so she suspected). Sheilas mother and the sales assistant, Miss Francis, had both advised Sheila that to try the dress on would be a mistake, but she had insisted. After having tried the dress on, Sheila knew immediately that the two had been right all along, and that the dress did not flatter her at all. Sheila described how this girl [Eva] had brought the dress up from the workroom, and when the assistant Miss Francis had asked her something about it, to show us what she meant, she had helped the dress up, as if she was wearing it. Sheila said it just suited her and that she was jealous of her figure and her dark eyes. Then, when Sheila was looking at herself in the dress, she caught sight of Eva smiling at Miss Francis. Becoming furious and taking the smile the wrong way, Sheila promptly demanded to see the manager and insisted that, unless they fired Eva, she would boycott the store forever. Sheila used her power as the daughter of a respected customer to make life difficult and miserable for Eva. This, we are told by the Inspector, was Evas final steady job she was never employed again. From Act One of the play, we could see that something was very wrong in the relationship between Sheila and her father, simply because of their difference in personality. When her father egotistically states his capitalist views and opinions on the working world and society in general, Sheila is at the forefront of protest. She says, but these girls arent cheap labour theyre people! I think that, from Sheilas siding with Eric following the departure of the Inspector and her reluctance to believe that the whole affair was simply a hoax, she has learnt more from the story (and definitely the possible reality) of Eva Smith and her plight, that any other member of her family. I suppose were all nice people now, says Sheila sarcastically. She means, of course, to mock the attitude of her family and her fianci in realisation of their involvement with Eva Smith and her death. Much to her dismay, disbelief and disappointment, they cling onto their last shreds of dignity in a way that only self-centred narcissistic people do (Was he really a police Inspector? How do we know any girl killed herself today? ) and attempting to erase the previous few hours. Mr. Birling even offers the men a drink! Sheila, however, is adamant that she will prove her point that each one of them still has a great deal to be sorry for. Sheila is just as uncertain as any of the other family members as to whether or not Eva existed as one girl or as five but the mysterious figure of Eva has affected her deeply. It doesnt alter the fact that we all helped to kill her, she says. In my opinion, Sheila is right! Inspector Goole acts very much as the voice of J. B. Priestley and of Eva Smith; especially during his final speech when he told the family, there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us all intertwined with our lives we dont live alone. Mr Birling needs to have taken note of the Inspectors lesson, in which he warned people of being taught in fire and blood and anguish if they did not begin to realise how their apparently trivial or self-righteous actions have significant effects on others around them. Despite Sheilas pleas and analytical attitude towards the Inspectors speech and his presence, Mr. Birling and his wife typically endeavour to pass her words off as childish misunderstanding: Really, from the way you children [Eric and Sheila] talk, you might be wanting to help him instead of us! However, is the reality of that statement so ridiculous? I certainly feel that the intentions of the Inspector and Eva Smith, whoever they were, were to remind them to help each other and to help others in society, however far beneath them in terms of social hierarchy they are considered to be. Eva, whether real or imaginary (and the feeling of her existence is certainly very strong), is a very touching archetype of societys in difference, maybe even hatred, of others around them. This applies most fully to people of supposedly high social status people like Arthur Birling and his family who live in large houses and drink expensive port. Mr. Birling does not see that the Inspector has proved his society and all that nonsense theory to be absolutely incorrect. At the very end of Act Three, the telephone to the Birling household rings, and it is spookily confirmed that a girl has in fact died at the Infirmary that very night. Priestley describes the shock of the family members as they stare, guiltily. This is effective because every one of them is, in one way or another, guilty. The telephone call really seems to confirm the fact that the selfishness of each member of the Birling family and Gerald Croft, although maybe not quite so heavily in his case, has contributed to the death of a young woman. This brings the audience to the (intensely dramatic) end of the play, and we cannot help but wonder how the lives of the family will fare following this incident and the series of incidents during their recent years. We have been led to believe that Eva and her fate has brought about the possibility of Sheila and Eric changing their attitudes and the ways in which they react to members of society around them. Sheilas involvement with Eva Smiths death was the result of her very strong temper and the fact that she misused her high status to induce problems in the life of another. Eva Smith and her story will hopefully have caused her to rethink her actions and their possible consequences. Her brother Erics life had become intertwined with Evas when he was intoxicated at the Palace Variety Bar, and picked her up. Eric is a character whose life seems to have become very difficult and complicated it may have taken someone like Eva to make him change his ways and think about his disregard for everything rational and caring. The audience hopes, however, that the person upon whom Eva Smith has had the most dramatic effect is Arthur Birling. It is rather saddening to watch the family having had such an experience, almost a blessing, with a prophet such as Inspector Goole and his interrogation. This is because he has taught Arthur, Sybil, Sheila, Eric and Gerald a very valuable lesson, which half of the family has apparently taken no note of whatsoever. It is apparent that Eva Smith, Daisy Renton or whoever it was coming into contact with the Birling family over the said period of time may not exist, but this has not stopped her from having an extremely consequential effect on five people. Priestley has, fully intentionally of course, left us wondering if the Birlings will think about their effect upon people around them or whether they will have to be taught their lesson of concern for those of lower social standing in fire, blood and anguish.

Visual Arts Movements from 30,000 BC-400 AD

Visual Arts Movements from 30,000 BC-400 AD Prehistory Paleolithic (Old Stone Age) Art  - 30,000-10,000 B.C.Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age) Art  - 10,000-8000 B.C.Neolithic (New Stone Age) Art  - 8000-3000 B.C.Bronze Age Art - 2500-800 B.C.Iron Age Art - 750-50 B.C. Ancient Civilizations Mesopotamia Sumerian Art - 3000-2300 B.C.Akkadian Art - 2300-2150 B.C.Neo-Sumerian Art - 2150-2000 B.C.Babylonian Art - 1900-1600 B.C.Assyrian Art - 900-612 B.C.Neo-Babylonian Art - 625-539 B.C. Egypt Early Dynastic Art - 3500-2686 B.C.Old Kingdom Art - 2686-2185 B.C.Middle Kingdom Art - 2133-1750 B.C.Early New Kingdom Art - 1570-1353 B.C.Amarna Art - 1353-1332 B.C.Late New Kingdom Art - 1332-1075 B.C.Late Period Art - 750-332 B.C.Macedonian Dynasty Art - 332-304 B.C.Ptolemaic Dynasty Art - 304-30 B.C. The Cycladic Islands/Crete Early Minoan Art - 2800-2000 B.C.Middle Minoan Art - 2000-1700 B.C.Late Minoan Art - 1550-1400 B.C. Phoenician Art - 1500-500 B.C. Nomadic Tribes Luristan Art - 700-500 B.C.Scythian Art - 600-300 B.C. Persian Empire Art - 539-331 B.C. Classical Civilizations Greek Art Mycenaean Art - 1550-1200 B.C.Sub-Mycenaean Art - 1100-1025 B.C.Proto-Geometric Art - 1025-900 B.C.Geometric Art - 900-700 B.C.Archaic Art - 700-480 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Orientalizing Phase - 735-650 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Early Archaic - 700-600 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  High Archaic - 600-520 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Late Archaic - 520-480 B.C.Classical Art - 480-323 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Early Classical - 480-450 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  High Classical - 450-400 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Late Classical - 400-323 B.C.Hellenistic Art - 323-31 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Early Hellenistic - 323-250 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  High Hellenistic - 250-100 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Late Hellenistic - 100 -31 B.C. Etruscan Art Early Iron Age Art - 9th century-ca. 675 B.C.Orientalizing Phase - ca. 675-ca. 575 B.C.Archaic Period Art - ca. 575-ca. 480 B.C.Classical Period Art - ca. 480-ca. 300 B.C.Hellenistic Period Art - ca. 300-ca. 50 B.C. Roman Art Republican Art - 510-27 B.C.Early Roman Empire Art - 27 B.C.-235 A.D.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Augustan - 27 B.C.-14 A.D.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Julio-Claudian - 14-68  Ã‚  Ã‚  Flavian - 69-96  Ã‚  Ã‚  Trajanic - 98-117  Ã‚  Ã‚  Hadrianic - 117-138  Ã‚  Ã‚  Antonine - 138-192  Ã‚  Ã‚  Severin - 193-235Late Roman Empire/Late Antique Art - 235-476 Judean Art - 600 B.C.-135 A.D. Celtic Art Early Style - ca. 450-ca. 350 B.C.Waldalgesheim Style - ca. 350-ca. 250 B.C.Sword and Plastic Styles - ca. 250-ca. 125 B.C.Oppida Period Art - ca. 125-ca. 50 B.C.Britain and Ireland before 600 A.D. Parthian and Sassanidic Art - 238 B.C.-637 A.D. Non-Western Ancient Art China Neolithic – ca. 6,000–ca. 1,600 B.C.Shang Dynasty – 1,766–1,045 B.C.Zhou Dynasty – 1,045–256 B.C.Qin Dynasty – 221–206 B.C.Han Dynasty – 206 B.C.–220 A.D.Three Kingdoms Period – 220–280Western Jin Dynasty – 265–316Six Dynasties Period – 222–589Northern and Southern Dynasties Period – 310–589 Japan Jomon – 4,500–200 B.C.Yayoi – 200 B.C.–200 A.D.Kofun – 200–500 Indian Subcontinent Indus Valley – 4,000–1,800 B.C.Sarasvati-Sindhu Civilization - 3,000–1,500 B.C.Aryan India - 1,500–500 B.C.The Mauryan Empire - 321–233 B.C.Gandhara and Kushan School – 1st–3rd centuries A.D.The Gupta Dynasty - 320–510 Africa Rock Art in Southern AfricaSahara - Bubalus Period – ca. 6,000–ca. 3,500 B.C.Lower Nubia – ca. 3,500–2,000 B.C.Kush – 2,000 B.C.–325 A.D.Pre-dynastic Kemet – to 3,050 B.C.The Nok Culture - 400 B.C.–200 A.D.Aksum - 350 B.C.–1,000 A.D. North America Mexico   Ã‚  Ã‚  Olmec Art - 1,200–350 B.C.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Zapotec Art – 1,400 B.C.–400 A.D.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Huastec Art - ca. 1000 B.C.-1521 A.D.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Mayan Art - 300 B.C.–800 A.D. South America Valdivian Art - ca. 4,000-ca. 1,500 B.C.Chavin Art - ca. 2,600-ca. 200 B.C.San Agustin - ca. 800 B.C.-ca. 1630 A.D.Moche and Nasca Art - ca. 200 B.C.-ca. 600 A.D.

Effects of quantitative easing on food prices Research Paper - 1

Effects of quantitative easing on food prices - Research Paper Example Instead of that food prices now depend on global demand and supply. Dependence on global market leads to speculation which makes food price volatile. Volatility is a characteristic of the market but irresponsible monitory policies generate the market more volatile and drive prices up. Generally weather, speculation and a number of other faults would have been considered as responsible but here monetary policy and quantitative easing (QE) or printing new money are the main reasons. This policy can be done by the central bank only because everyone accepts this money as a payment. People use this money to buy government and corporate bonds, equity and houses. In addition central bank sometimes lowers the interest rate on new bonds and loans and this will make additional pressure on money market. It encourages greater spending. On the other hand bank can also improve their position and show their interest in money lending (Fry). Effects: There is also a negative impact. Firstly, the prin ting of new money raises the purchasing power of the consumer and the demand of products increase. For that people demand more money but the central bank fails to supply that amount of money. This leads to inflation in economy. Then to control the situation central bank decides to increase interest rate on both credit and deposit. For that central bank loss money on its purchase and suggest the government to impose higher tax rate on goods and services. Secondly, creating and spending money lowers the value of currency and it causes inflation or hyper inflation. This exploits the purchasing power due to instable price level. Last of all, QE demolishes the confidence of an economy. Thus we can say that QE is counterproductive for an economy and central bank cannot impose QE anyhow (The Financial Times Lexicon). According to some economist QE is not main responsible for rising of food prices. Poor people have to understand that they should maintain their food habits basis on supply of those goods in world market. If there is seen a shortage of that good people should adjust their food habit according to the situation. This can make a stable situation in the food market which directly affects the prices of foods (Lagi et al). Gradual increase of basic food prices has severe impacts on huge population across the world. There is a lack of confusion about the factors which are responsible for this situation. The main cause of price increase of food is investor speculation. In recent years it is clearly seen that the supply and demand are not consistent with the actual price dynamics. The exploitation of food prices in 2007-08 and 2010-11 were mainly happened due to the investor speculation (Lagi et al). Along with that the consumption of ethanol is another reason. The excessive consumption of ethanol in US gave a huge negative impact in the global market. It increased the price of ethanol sharply. More over these adverse results are not only seen in the commodity ma rket but also seen in the asset market. It increased the expected returns from equities and bonds. Though some economists have claimed speculators cannot affect the food market directly. According to them food prices are set up through the market mechanism and deregulation of the price system. Price system is generally controlled by the practitioners of the market. Therefore, there is a huge chance of making disingenuous price system. They generally set the price level with respect to their profit maximization

Discuss how RAID can be implimented Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Discuss how RAID can be implimented - Essay Example back is its high cost due to use of a separate processor and software which gives the RAID system greater strength to handle recovery and disk rebuilding. Another approach to implementing hardware RAID is IOC. The advantage of controller-based RAID is that it is cheaper because it simply uses processors on the disk controllers. However, controller based RAID is restricted by the power of the processor and the memory bandwidth of the controller, which makes it slower than IOP RAID. On the other hand, software RAID can be implemented using a disk controller driver or an operating system. Software RAID is cheaper than hardware RAID but is not as reliable. Software RAID may be useful in small applications where quality performance is not really expected. It is used in the drivers of the hard disk controllers and is independent of the operating system. Operating System based RAID uses a RAID engine in the operating system. Both disk controller driver and operating system driver RAID are dependent on system processor which can be specifically used in low performance and lightly loaded

The Eastern Shore of Virginia :: essays research papers

The Eastern Shore of Virginia, a peninsula located east of mainland Virginia, not noticed on many maps. The Eastern Shore has grown in the past year, putting up new shops and fast food restaurants. There are some interesting town names such as Temperanceville, Exmore, or Accomac. The name Temperanceville was brought by Christians who burned the four bars on the corners of Saxis road and Lankford highway. A new road was made named Temperanceville road. Temperance means no alcohol and that’s why the Christians burned the bars. Interesting stories are found all across the eastern shore.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In the past few years many shops and stores have been built. These stores have provided many citizens of the shore less traveling miles on their cars and less troubles of finding what they need. Food Lion in Oak Hall has made many people happy because now they don’t have to go to Exmore, Onancock, or Princess Anne to get all their shopping needs. There are landmarks that people talk about it New York, like T’s Corner for example. T’s Corner is going 69 years in the summer of 2005 and is the Eastern Shore’s first cigarette outlet. A Sonic’s America Drive In ® was recently built and has its best business ever in its first month. The shore is becoming more industrialized as Verizon ® DSL spreads across the shore.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The shore has many unique smells like low tide, marsh mud, Perdue, Tyson’s, the Clam Factory, and Saxis which many tourist take for granted. On Chincoteague Island, the best time to go is at low tide because all of the tourists are trying to avoid it. Many recreational activities can be done on the island like going to the beach, going put-put golfing, watching a movie at the Island Roxy, or getting your hair cut at Barber Bob’s. Chicken houses found up and down the shore make it feel like home, because it makes the shore unique from the city. Many great schools are found on the shore like Arcadia High and Middle, Chincoteague Combined, and Nandua High and Middle. Not many high schools across America teach the college class Botany. Botany is only taught at Arcadia High School on the shore.

Business Law, Articles

Incidents that could mean an existence of partnership: **share in profits and losses, equal rights to management, every partner binds the other partners, all partners are liable or debts except partners with limited liabilities, partners have a relation, dissolution does not terminate the partnership but continues until the partnership is completed again. 3. 7. Partnership distinguished from co- ownership Co-ownership – ownership Of an undivided thing or right belongs to different persons Difference of co-ownership and partnership as to†¦Creation – co-ownership is created by law, it may exist even without a contract, while a partnership is created by contract. Juridical personality -? co- ownership has a separate juridical parties while partnership has none. Repose: co-ownership – common enjoyment of something or a right, partnership: profit Duration: co-ownership – 10 years, partnership: no limitation Disposal of interest (share in profit) – p artnership: cannot dispose interest without consent of all partners, co-ownership: may freely do so Power to act with third persons – partner could bind the partnership, co- owner could not bind the co-ownership.Only one judgment against co- owners does not bind the other co-owners. Effect of death: co-ownership does not necessarily dissolve co-ownership, partnership: dissolves (A & B greed to share 1000 pesos to buy a land that would be divided equally between them: co-ownership, because there is no agreement that it would be used for business purposes. ) 3. 8. Partnership distinguished from conjugal partnership of gains Conjugal partnership gains – formed by marriage wherein husband and wife place in a common fund the income from their separate properties Difference of business partnership and conjugal partnership as to†¦Parties – business: voluntary agreement Of two or more, conjugal: husband and wife agrees Laws which govern – business: governed y stipulation (agreement) of parties, conjugal: by law Juridical personality – business: has separate juridical personality, conjugal: none Commencement (beginning) – partnership: from execution of contract (unless stipulated), conjugal: from celebration of marriage, stipulation is void Purpose – business: profit, conjugal: regulate properties of husband and wife Distribution of profits: business: according to agreement or in proportion to the capital shared, conjugal: divided equally Management – business: equally, unless one is appointed as manager, conjugal: husband's decisions prevail Disposition of hares – business: may be disposed without the consent of the others, conjugal: cannot be disposed during marriage, even with consent 3. 9. Partnership distinguished from voluntary associations.

Using the Spanish Verb Sentir

Sentir is a very common verb that typically means to feel. It usually refers to feeling emotions, but it can also refer to physical sensations. The Difference Between Sentir and Sentirse Sentir commonly appears in the reflexive form sentirse. The difference in using sentir and sentirse is that sentir is typically followed by a noun, while sentirse is followed by an adjective or adverb describing how a person feels. Otherwise their meanings are essentially the same. Here are some examples of sentir used to describe emotional feelings: El atleta dijo que sentà ­a alegrà ­a y satisfaccià ³n por el logro del campeonato. (The athlete said he felt joyful and satisfied about attaining the championship.)Siento pena y tristeza por ello. (I feel shameful and sad about it.)Se siente feliz por ser abuela. (She feels happy about being a grandmother.)Me siento enojada y frustrada. (I feel angry and frustrated.) Here are examples of sentir being used with physical sensations. Although in most of these cases you could probably translate sentir as to sense, usually it would be better to translate based on the context: Puedo sentir pasos en la azotea. (I can hear footsteps on the roof.)Él me dijo que sentà ­a olor a muerte. (He told me he smelled death.) When sentirse de refers to a body part, it usually indicates the sensation of pain: Me siento de la cabeza. (I have a headache.) Standing by itself, sentir can indicate sorrow or regret: Lo siento mucho. Im very sorry. Using Sentir in Phrases It is common to use sentir as part of a phrase. Although you may not use feel in the most natural translation, often you can determine the meaning of the phrase from the individual words. Some examples: sentir algo por una persona (to have love or similar feelings for someone): Decirte que ya no siento algo por ti serà ­a mentir. (To say I no longer have feelings for you would be lying.) sentir celos (to be jealous): Cree que sà ³lo sienten celos las personas inseguras. (She believes that only insecure people have jealousy.) sentir culpa, sentirse culpable (to feel guilty): No sentà ­a culpa por lo que acababa de hacer. (He did not feel guilty for what he had just done.) sentir ganas de infinitivo (to feel like doing something): Siento ganas de llorar cuando pienso en el accidente. (I feel like crying when I think about the accident.) sentir que (to be sorry or sad that): Siento que mi color de piel ha cambiado. (I am sad the color of my hair has changed.) hacer sentir (to cause a feeling in someone): A veces nos hacemos adictos a alguien que nos hace sentir bien. (Sometimes we become addicted to someone who makes us feel good.) sin sentir (without being noticed): Tomà © la medicina sin sentir ninguna diferencia en mi vida. (I took the medicine without noticing any difference in my life.) This phrase is sometimes best translated literally:  ¿Cà ³mo es posible que te lo diga sin sentir? (How is it possible that she told you that without any feeling?) Using Sentir as a Noun Sentir also can be used as a noun to refer to feelings or sentiments: El sentir y el pensar son dos funciones de la mente. (Feeling and thinking are two functions of the mind.)El presidente representa el sentir del pueblo. (The president represents the feelings of the people.)Tenà ­a una vida dedicada a la promocià ³n del sentir indà ­gena. (He had a life dedicated to the promotion of indigenous sentiment.)Las almas no nos permitieron matar sin sentir. (Our souls did not allow us to kill unfeelingly.)Entiende muy bien el sentir de la calle. (He understands very well the feelings on the street.) Conjugation of Sentir Keep in mind that sentir  is irregularly conjugated. When it is stressed, the sent- of the stem changes to sient-, as in siento, I feel. And in some but not all forms, the stem changes to sint-, as in sintià ³, he or she felt. Unfortunately, this second stem change doesnt occur in a predictable way. The conjugation pattern is shared by about three dozen other verbs. Among them are consentir (to allow), convertir (to change), mentir (to lie), and preferir (to prefer). Also, the conjugated forms of sentir overlap with those of sentar, which means to sit. For example, siento can mean either I feel or I sit. This overlap is seldom a problem because the two verbs are used in such different contexts. Key Takeaways Sentir is a common Spanish verb that typically means to feel, especially in an emotional or mental sense.There is usually little difference in meaning between sentir and its reflexive form, sentirse.Sentir is conjugated irregularly in that its stem sometimes changes to sient- or sint-.